by Dr Feng Chi-sun
There is a serious
shortage of doctors in Hong Kong and it affects mainly public hospitals. Based on the frequently
cited figures, more than 90% of inpatient services are performed in public
hospitals, where fewer than 50% of our doctors work.
Since it takes years
to train a doctor, the obvious quick remedy is to hire overseas doctors. When
Hong Kong was a British colony, all Commonwealth doctors are eligible to
practice in Hong Kong; non-Commonwealth ones had to take a qualifying exam.
After the handover, all foreign medical graduates have to take the exam, which
is notorious for its level of difficulty, with a pass rate of 10% or
less.
It's no wonder we
continue not to have enough doctors in public hospitals, and waiting time for
elective surgeries takes months and years.
To solve the shortage
problem, Hong Kong's Hospital Authority has come up with a solution that some
argue is flawed. It is giving limited license to selective non-local medical
graduates so that they can practice in public hospitals without taking the
exam. The candidates must speak Cantonese and hold a valid medical degree. Fair
enough. But that's where the transparency and accountability of the selection
process ends. By picking candidates based on their paper credentials and not by
a more objective method, such as test scores, the authority is inclined to
admit only medical graduates from world-renowned schools from Western
countries, and exclude those from less prestigious ones, especially those from
the mainland.
The difference between
an ethnic Chinese from a Canadian medical school and one from a Chinese medical
school is the family background. But, unlike family wealth and prestige, medical
knowledge is acquired and not inherited. Regardless of their undergraduate
medical education, all doctors have an equal chance of being nurtured into a
highly competent healer. Doctors learn most of their skills at the postgraduate
stage.
Perhaps, a better way
for the Hospital Authority to deal with the shortage crisis is to recruit
Cantonese-speaking non-local medical graduates from around the world, and lower
the entry bar for them to start working in Hong Kong by easing the exam to a
level at which the pass rate is at least 50%. The way the current exam is
structured, it is suitable only for fresh graduates, but is counter-productive
to our goal of recruiting competent doctors. Many of the candidates have
already had a few years of practice experience in their own fields, and might
have forgotten many didactic facts in other areas. Is there really any need for
a future ophthalmologist to also have indepth knowledge of gynecology?
And like in the US,
they could start work as an intern, and are allowed a full license only after
years of training and passing a more advanced exam in their specialty.
The approach used by
the Hospital Authority in picking candidates to work for them is problematic
because it is whimsical and non-transparent, and easily perceived to be
discriminatory or having a hidden agenda. It invites criticism and possibly
lawsuits.
Most of all, the pool
of potential medical geniuses is much bigger on the mainland than the small
group of Cantonese-speaking doctors who graduated from Western countries. Hong
Kong will lose out if this valuable human resource is not tapped.
The author was a
consultant pathologist for the Hong Kong government and St. Paul's Hospital
before his recent retirement. He was a lecturer at the Medical Faculty of the
Chinese University of Hong Kong and a diplomate of the American Board of
Pathologists.
Source: China Daily
Source: China Daily
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add a comment